Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53073: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissecto

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53073: /trunk/epan/dissectors/

From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:08:24 +0100

On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 07:57:21AM +0000, Anders Broman wrote:
> >OK, looks like I missed something: We have this kind of forward declarations in ~72% of the dissectors but not in the remaining ones. Maybe we should decide on one style and fix the remaining dissectors?
> >
> 
> I'd vote for fixing the remaining ones.

Reverted. Thanks for pointing this out!

 Jörg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53073: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-btavdtp.c
  - From: Anders Broman
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53073: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-btavdtp.c
  - From: Joerg Mayer
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53073: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-btavdtp.c
  - From: Anders Broman

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] How can I reassemble fragments from two different datagrams in the same frame?
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53073: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-btavdtp.c
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] How can I reassemble fragments from two different datagrams in the same frame?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread