On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:18:01AM -0600, Gerald Combs wrote:
> Enough major changes have been introduced since the last release to
> warrant bumping the minor revision. I figure we may as well bump it to
> 0.99.0 in order to prepare for an impending 1.0 release.
>
> Along with the items in http://wiki.ethereal.com/Development/Roadmap I'd
> like to do the following before 1.0:
>
> - Finalize dumpcap - Ulf, I'm not sure how much work is left, but is
> dumpcap in good enough shape for a security audit? If so, we could
> make it set{u|g}id on platforms that need it.
tethereal doesn't use dumpcap, so it's not finished yet.
> - Smooth out the Windows file dialogs: The "Filter" button doesn't
> work, for instance.
Get us a nice file dialog for Unix/Linux as well.
> - Improve our packages:
> - Polish the RPM spec file. (The last time I tried to build the
> SRPM under SUSE, it failed.)
I can have a look at that during the next two weeks (lots of work
currently).
> - Fix the annoying display-filter-stalls-due-to-hostname-lookup bug.
I think this is "fixed" for people who have turned off network name
resolving but not when it is turned on?
> - Add version checking to the Help menu, similar to Firefox and other
> apps?
I don't think so. We really shouldn't be doing a package management
stuff inside each application.
> - Designate a set of dissectors as "known safe"?
I'm undecided :)
As far as the discussion on api-stability is concerned: I don't care
about the api getting stable - ever. On the contrary, a stable api would
hamper the development.
Ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
