Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Preparing for 1.0

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 22:31:21 +0100
Just a question regarding the last point:
Designate a set of dissectors as "known safe"?

What are the requirements for such dissectors and what are the consequences?

Best regards
Michael


On Mar 1, 2006, at 22:17 Uhr, Joerg Mayer wrote:

On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:18:01AM -0600, Gerald Combs wrote:
Enough major changes have been introduced since the last release to
warrant bumping the minor revision. I figure we may as well bump it to
0.99.0 in order to prepare for an impending 1.0 release.

Along with the items in http://wiki.ethereal.com/Development/Roadmap I'd
like to do the following before 1.0:

  - Finalize dumpcap - Ulf, I'm not sure how much work is left, but is
dumpcap in good enough shape for a security audit? If so, we could
    make it set{u|g}id on platforms that need it.

tethereal doesn't use dumpcap, so it's not finished yet.

  - Smooth out the Windows file dialogs: The "Filter" button doesn't
    work, for instance.

Get us a nice file dialog for Unix/Linux as well.

  - Improve our packages:
    - Polish the RPM spec file.  (The last time I tried to build the
      SRPM under SUSE, it failed.)

I can have a look at that during the next two weeks (lots of work
currently).

  - Fix the annoying display-filter-stalls-due-to-hostname-lookup bug.

I think this is "fixed" for people who have turned off network name
resolving but not when it is turned on?

- Add version checking to the Help menu, similar to Firefox and other
    apps?

I don't think so. We really shouldn't be doing a package management
stuff inside each application.

  - Designate a set of dissectors as "known safe"?

I'm undecided :)

As far as the discussion on api-stability is concerned: I don't care
about the api getting stable - ever. On the contrary, a stable api would
hamper the development.

 Ciao
   Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev