Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Fuzzy searches ?? (Possible)
From: "Gaudineer, Kevin" <GAUDINKL@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:50:49 -0500
This is embarrassing But that was the trick. Thanks for the help... :) Iowa Health System Kevin L. Gaudineer Phone: (515)-241-7745 Cell: (515)-205-3069 -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of j.snelders@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:31 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Fuzzy searches ?? (Possible) Hi Kevin, What about this display filter: smb.file contains "File Name" Hope this helps Joan On Tue, 26 May 2009 14:32:31 -0500 Kevin Gaudineer wrote: > >Not sure if this is possible but at one time I thought I had read an >article (or post) about doing a fuzzy search with a Wireshark trace. My >scenario is that I am trying to chase a issue but it is unknown when the >issue will happen. So the support team has handed me a series of trace >files that span several hours. What I know is that the issue they want >me to find is during a file transfer and the filenames to have a series >of characters that are consistent during the transfer. > >What I am trying to do is merge some of the trace files together around >the time frame they gave when this issue happened, and I am trying to >create a filter using a display filter with 'smb.file == {fuzzy search >expression here} ' but I am not having luck. Is it possible to do a >search this way or should I just be trying to do the search with >offsets? > > > >Kevin L. Gaudineer > >Phone: (515)-241-7745 > >Cell: (515)-205-3069 > >Email: gaudinkl@xxxxxxx > > > > > > > > ******************************************** > >This message and accompanying documents are covered by the >Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?? 2510-2521, >and contain information intended for the specified individual(s) only. >This information is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient >or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you > >are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and >that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action >based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you > >have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately >by e-mail, and delete the original message. > > ********************************************* > >Bijlage: image001.jpg > >_______________________________________________________________________ ____ >Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users >Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users > mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe ________________________________________________________________________ ___ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe ******************************************** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and contain information intended for the specified individual(s) only. This information is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. *********************************************
- References:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Fuzzy searches ?? (Possible)
- From: j . snelders
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Fuzzy searches ?? (Possible)
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Interpreting "Retransmission"? (Martin Visser)
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-users] Information about rtvc1 (RTVideo)
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Fuzzy searches ?? (Possible)
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Interpreting "Retransmission"? (Martin Visser)
- Index(es):