Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capt

From: Stig Bjørlykke <stig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 22:26:08 +0200

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:21 PM,  <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Log:
>  Say "none" rather than "unknown" if there are no IP addresses; in most
>  if not all cases, it's not that we don't know the IP addresses, it's
>  that there are no IP addresses to know.

What about displaying nothing in the interface list, and "none" in the details?
Like in the attached patch.

BTW, why do we build the same string ("<b>%s</b>\n<span
size='small'>%s</span>") 4 different places?

-- 
Stig Bjørlykke

Attachment: interface-list-no-none.patch
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture_if_dlg.c
  - From: Guy Harris
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture_if_dlg.c
  - From: Michael Tüxen

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] capture_dlg.c: several "unused_but_set" warnings [GCC 4.6]
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture_if_dlg.c
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 38507: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture_if_dlg.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread