Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFC Try 2: Rework of Makefiles in asn1-directory
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:32:53 +0200
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:49:13AM +0200, Kukosa, Tomas wrote:
> the $(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST) should be used somewhere in the Makefile.inc
> and Makefile.inc.nmake 
> Probably
> 	$(PYTHON) "../../tools/asn2wrs.py" \
> 		$(A2W_FLAGS) \
> 		-p $(PROTOCOL_NAME) \
> 		-c $(PROTOCOL_NAME).cnf \
> 		-s packet-$(PROTOCOL_NAME)-template \
> 		$(ASN_FILE_LIST) \
> 		$(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST)
> 
> The question is what should be the order if "$(ASN_FILE_LIST)
> $(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST)" or "$(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST) $(ASN_FILE_LIST)".

In the past it was $(ASN..) $(EXT_ASN...).

If it's OK I'll commit v2 plus this change.

ciao
     Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.