Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFC Try 2: Rework of Makefiles in asn1-directory
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: "Kukosa, Tomas" <tomas.kukosa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:49:13 +0200
Hi,

the $(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST) should be used somewhere in the Makefile.inc
and Makefile.inc.nmake 
Probably
	$(PYTHON) "../../tools/asn2wrs.py" \
		$(A2W_FLAGS) \
		-p $(PROTOCOL_NAME) \
		-c $(PROTOCOL_NAME).cnf \
		-s packet-$(PROTOCOL_NAME)-template \
		$(ASN_FILE_LIST) \
		$(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST)

The question is what should be the order if "$(ASN_FILE_LIST)
$(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST)" or "$(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST) $(ASN_FILE_LIST)".




> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 4:04 PM
> To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] RFC Try 2: Rework of Makefiles in 
> asn1-directory
> 
> OK, I've committed the changes to asn2wrs and have updated 
> the Makefiles
> to (hopefully) accomodate Thomas' comments.
> 
> I'd like some feedback whether this has been tested on Windows, as I
> can only test on Linux.
> 
>  ciao
>      Joerg
> -- 
> Joerg Mayer                                           
> <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just 
> stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
>