Hi,
For now? Yes
Thanx,
Jaap
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Sebastien Tandel wrote:
> Hi Jaap,
>
>
> I am not defending anything here (cause as you said I can change this
> preference rule) but I don't get to the point. CDP is only implemented
> on Cisco routers but there are also Juniper, Hitachi, Alcatel, Nortel,
> 6wind etc... Having Cisco routers does not imply you'll configure CDP.
> Furthermore, you clearly won't if there are others vendors routers in
> your network. Last but not least, CDP does not seem to support IPv6. Do
> you really think it's the best option?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sebastien Tandel
>
>
> Jaap Keuter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It dropped the more common CDP part of the rule for the less common ISIS
> > part. It can be a personal prefernce but I didn't see a reason to force
> > this onto everyone.
> >
> > Thanx,
> > Jaap
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Any reason the colorfilter update wasn't checked in?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Checked in.
> >>>
> >>> Thanx,
> >>> Jaap
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Sebastien Tandel wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is a patch for the management of the bad/good checksum for ISIS
> >>>> (like TCP/UDP/IP).
> >>>> support added for :
> >>>> - booleans hf_isis_lsp_checksum_good, hf_isis_lsp_checksum_bad in the tree,
> >>>> - information in the info column if bad checksum,
> >>>> - expert info for bad checksum,
> >>>> - color filters update
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Best Regards,
> >>>> Sebastien Tandel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
