Hi Jaap,
I am not defending anything here (cause as you said I can change this
preference rule) but I don't get to the point. CDP is only implemented
on Cisco routers but there are also Juniper, Hitachi, Alcatel, Nortel,
6wind etc... Having Cisco routers does not imply you'll configure CDP.
Furthermore, you clearly won't if there are others vendors routers in
your network. Last but not least, CDP does not seem to support IPv6. Do
you really think it's the best option?
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It dropped the more common CDP part of the rule for the less common ISIS
> part. It can be a personal prefernce but I didn't see a reason to force
> this onto everyone.
>
> Thanx,
> Jaap
>
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>
>
>> Any reason the colorfilter update wasn't checked in?
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Checked in.
>>>
>>> Thanx,
>>> Jaap
>>>
>>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Sebastien Tandel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Here is a patch for the management of the bad/good checksum for ISIS
>>>> (like TCP/UDP/IP).
>>>> support added for :
>>>> - booleans hf_isis_lsp_checksum_good, hf_isis_lsp_checksum_bad in the tree,
>>>> - information in the info column if bad checksum,
>>>> - expert info for bad checksum,
>>>> - color filters update
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Sebastien Tandel
>>>>
>>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
