Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9454] ethertype() as dissector
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:58:54 +0000

Comment # 2 on bug 9454 from
(In reply to comment #1)
> However may be better place
> for "ethertype_data_t" is in packet-ethertype.c instead of packet.h. A lot
> of dissectors use this model.

"ethertype_data_t" needs to be in a header file (assuming your
packet-ethertype.c wasn't a typo) and I didn't think it was worth it to create
a new header file just for this function.  Since ethertype() was already
declared in packet.h, I just replaced it with the necessary structure.  Had
packet-ethertype.h already existed, yes I would have placed it there.


You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are watching all bug changes.