Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9024] New: fix Length field of the Attributes TLV (RSVP)
Bug ID |
9024
|
Summary |
fix Length field of the Attributes TLV (RSVP)
|
Classification |
Unclassified
|
Product |
Wireshark
|
Version |
SVN
|
Hardware |
x86
|
OS |
All
|
Status |
UNCONFIRMED
|
Severity |
Major
|
Priority |
Medium
|
Component |
Dissection engine (libwireshark)
|
Assignee |
bugzilla-admin@wireshark.org
|
Reporter |
francesco.fondelli@gmail.com
|
CC |
francesco.fondelli@gmail.com
|
Attachment #11358 Flags |
review_for_checkin?
|
Created attachment 11358 [details]
fix Length field of the Attributes TLV (RSVP)
Build Information:
wireshark 1.11.0 (SVN Rev 51212 from /trunk)
Copyright 1998-2013 Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled (64-bit) with GTK+ 2.18.9, with Cairo 1.8.8, with Pango 1.26.2, with
GLib 2.22.5, with libpcap, with libz 1.2.3, with POSIX capabilities (Linux),
with libnl 1, without SMI, with c-ares 1.7.4, with Lua 5.1, without Python,
with
GnuTLS 2.4.1, with Gcrypt 1.5.0, with MIT Kerberos, without GeoIP, with
PortAudio V19-devel (built Feb 21 2009), without AirPcap.
Running on Linux 3.0.74-0.6.8-default, with locale C, with libpcap version
0.9-PRE-CVS, with libz 1.2.3, GnuTLS 2.4.1, Gcrypt 1.5.0.
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz
Built using gcc 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973].
--
Hi,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5420#section-14
14. Changes from RFC 4420 to RFC 5420
This document obsoletes RFC 4420 [RFC4420]. The only change is in
Section 3. Section 3 describes the semantic of the Length field of
the Attributes TLV.
Prior to the change, the Length field indicated the length of the
Value field only. After the change, as described in Section 3, the
Length field indicates the length of the whole TLV.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
---
In dissect_rsvp_lsp_attributes() there is a check for invalid Attributes
TLV length that is no more correct in light of changes described in
Section 14 of RFC 5420 (copied above for your convenience).
Please check this in.
Thank you
Ciao
Fra
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.