Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2613] Add explination of built-in vs plugin dissectors to
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2613


Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #3 from Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-06-17 12:29:53 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I agree there's no hard-n-fast rule but, at the same time, how many times have
you (Jaap) or I or anyone else asked someone to resubmit a plugin as a built-in
dissector?

Given that there seems to be a significant preference (among the core
developers) for built-in, I think it would make sense to add a blurb in
README.developer.  (Maybe README.plugins, too, but I have to admit that I did
not read that document when I first started writing dissectors and probably
still have never read it...)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.