Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Should some patches from debian/patches/ be applied

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:13:00 -0700
Guy Harris wrote:

Speaking of Debian updates, should there be a README file to indicate what packaging files need to be updated, in what fashion, when a new file is added to the list of installed files in Ethereal? If, for example, a new plugin is added, the NSIS script has to be updated - but, apparently, none of the other packaging files do.

And, looking at the various Debianisms, there's a "debian/ethereal-root.desktop" file, that runs Ethereal under "gksu", so it runs as root. However, it differs from the top-level "ethereal.desktop" file in some other ways:

1) There are "Name[]=" entries for Korean, Tamil, Ukrainian, and Vietnamese in the "ethereal.desktop" file, but not in the "ethereal-root.desktop" file. The one for Vietnamese is probably redundant (I assume the "Name=" entry is used for languages that don't have explicit strings), but the others are presumably used because Korean, Tamil, and Ukrainian don't use the Roman alphabet (but they're not the only languages that don't - should there be more?). Presumably the "Name[]=" entries in "ethereal-root.desktop" should include translations of the "(as root)" parenthetical note, if those entries are put in "ethereal-root.desktop".

2) They have different "Icon=" values - which one is the appropriate icon for desktops?

3) The "Categories=" values are different - should Ethereal go in GTK, GNOME, or both (it doesn't currently use GNOME), and should it go into an "X-Red-Hat-Extra" category?

Also, is debian/ethereal.menu specific to the Debian menu system, or is it for any freedesktop.org (or other) desktop-neutral standard?