Ethereal-dev: [Ethereal-dev] Take2: Should some patches from debian/patches/ be applied?

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 08:20:50 +0200
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:13:35AM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> I've just updated the debian/ directory of ethereal to the current(?)
> debian patch file.
> 
> Can the people who know the respective code please have a look which of
> the following patches should be applied:
> 
> debian/patches/06_giop-buffer.dpatch
> debian/patches/10_ethereal_gen.dpatch
> debian/patches/11_diameter_vendors.dpatch

I forgot a part of the following: debian/patches/03_preferences.dpatch
as both FC4 and debian contain the following change:

--- ./epan/prefs.c      2005-07-17 18:36:36.000000000 +0200
+++ /tmp/dpep-work.b0Uwke/ethereal-0.10.11/epan/prefs.c 2005-07-17 18:38:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@
      */
     prefs.gui_font_name1 = g_strdup("-misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-iso
8859-1");
     /* XXX- is this the correct default font name for GTK2 none win32? */
-    prefs.gui_font_name2 = g_strdup("fixed medium 12");
+    prefs.gui_font_name2 = g_strdup("monospace 10");
 #endif
     prefs.gui_marked_fg.pixel        =     65535;
     prefs.gui_marked_fg.red          =     65535;

Is the default font too big? Should we change this in the main code too?

 Ciao
    Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.