Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] 0.10.8 soon?( Mate)

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: LEGO <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:30:00 +0100
There is a problem here, I did not actually test the config_filename
change until this patch, Now the "" configfile change makes mate to
call proto_register_subtree_array() after tree_is_expanded has already
been set which makes an assertion fail.

I got two potential solutions for this
1) a patch to proto.c that I've already posted that reallocates the
tree_is_expanded array
2) preallocating mate's ett[] and giving cfg_items a pointer to a the
single etts which would impose a maximum number of configurable items
in mate

I personally would go for 1: its already written and should not cause
any trouble since only in mate it is going to be evaluated and it
avoids a limit in mate's config.

I could do 2 If 1 cannot be applied.

Luis