Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] ldap tiny update

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:47:49 -0800 (PST)
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Pia Sahlberg wrote:

> Anyone know if there is a real difference between SPNEGO and GSSAPI?
> This change is the only thing that differs between them in the dissector.
> If they are identical we can collapse it into one single codepath.

My understanding is that GSSAPI does not have a way to specify negotiation 
of authentication method, which is what SPNEGO is for.

> >From: Guy Harris
> >
> >On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 02:05:39AM +0000, Pia Sahlberg wrote:
> > > Tiny update for LDAP.
> > > Sometimes when the emchanism is GSSAPI we might have an "empty"
> > > GSSAPI pdu in the negotiation.
> > >
> > > This patch makes ethereal stop marking them as unreassembled/short 
> >frame.
> >
> >Checked in.
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> ninemsn Premium transforms your e-mail with colours, photos and animated 
> text. Click here  http://ninemsn.com.au/premium/landing.asp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
> 

-- 
Regards
-----
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, 
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com