I think he was saying that the PDB files aren't getting regenerated, yet are
being placed in the executable. i.e. stale ones
-- Nathan
------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger EMail: nneul@xxxxxxx
University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841
Computing Services Fax: (573) 341-4216
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy Harris [mailto:gharris@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:21 AM
> To: Motonori Shindo
> Cc: gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Ethereal, new version due?
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:36:27PM +0900, Motonori Shindo wrote:
> > Please consider to check-in the patch I have posted the other day
> > before building 0.9.0. With or without this patch, debug
> info will be
> > embedded into *.exe anyway, so distributing separate *.pdb files is
> > obviously redundant.
>
> I may have missed something - did you mention, in an earlier message,
> that we're already embedding debug information into the
> executables, so
> that the *.pdb files we currently distribute aren't of any
> use, even if
> you have a debugger?
>
> If so, what difference does your patch make?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
