Wireshark · Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented?

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that migh

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:33:33 -0800

On Dec 14, 2012, at 1:17 AM, Peter Valdemar Mørch <peter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> To this end, I tried your suggestion:
> > tshark -2 -r unfiltered.pcap -R snmp -w snmp.pcap
> 
> To which I got:
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)

That's a bug.

Could you please file a report on that at http://bugs.wireshark.org so that this can be tracked, and attach your capture to it (so that it ends up in our "capture menagerie" for regression and fuzz testing)?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented?
  - From: Peter Valdemar Mørch

References:
- [Wireshark-users] tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented?
  - From: Peter Valdemar Mørch
- Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented?
  - From: Guy Harris
- Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented?
  - From: Peter Valdemar Mørch

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented?
Next by Date: [Wireshark-users] there is some message element uncomplete decoded
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented?
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread