Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark load query
From: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:28:56 +1000
Yeah, that is a bug/warning with that plugin dissector and has nothing to do with iostat/LOAD regards ronnie sahlberg On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, j.snelders <j.snelders@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Ronnie, > > The problem still exists in SVN37570. > > $ tshark -v > > ** (tshark.exe:2932): WARNING **: openSAFETY - SercosIII heuristic dissector > can > not be registered, openSAFETY/SercosIII native dissection. > TShark 1.7.0-SVN-37570 (SVN Rev 37570 from /trunk) > > Is this related to bug 5990 (SERCOS III built-in dissector (from plugin))? > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5990 > > Thanks > Joke > > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:43:03 +0200 j.snelders wrote: >>Hi Ronnie, >> >>The LOAD stats work, but with a warning. >>I also get this warning, while running on WinXP 32-bit. >> >>Thanks! >>Joke >> >>$ tshark -r test.pcap -qz "io,stat,360,LOAD(smb.time)smb.time" >> >>** (tshark.exe:2872): WARNING **: openSAFETY - SercosIII heuristic dissector >>can >>not be registered, openSAFETY/SercosIII native dissection. >> >>============================================================================ >>IO Statistics >>Interval: 360.000000 secs >>Column #0: LOAD(smb.time)smb.time >> | Column #0 | >>Time | LOAD | >>0000.000000-0360.000000 0.462096 >>0360.000000-0720.000000 0.100718 >>0720.000000-1080.000000 0.096485 >>1080.000000-1440.000000 0.035952 >>1440.000000-1800.000000 0.080976 >>1800.000000-2160.000000 0.008415 >>============================================================================ >> >>$ tshark -r test.pcap -qz "io,stat,720,LOAD(smb.time)smb.time" >> >>** (tshark.exe:2536): WARNING **: openSAFETY - SercosIII heuristic dissector >>can >>not be registered, openSAFETY/SercosIII native dissection. >> >>============================================================================ >>IO Statistics >>Interval: 720.000000 secs >>Column #0: LOAD(smb.time)smb.time >> | Column #0 | >>Time | LOAD | >>0000.000000-0720.000000 0.281407 >>0720.000000-1440.000000 0.066218 >>1440.000000-2160.000000 0.044695 >>============================================================================ >> >>$ tshark -v >> >>** (tshark.exe:2616): WARNING **: openSAFETY - SercosIII heuristic dissector >>can >>not be registered, openSAFETY/SercosIII native dissection. >>TShark 1.7.0-SVN-37568 (SVN Rev 37568 from /trunk) >> >>Copyright 1998-2011 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors. >>This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO >>warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. >> >>Compiled (64-bit) with GLib 2.26.1, with WinPcap (version unknown), with >>libz >>1.2.5, without POSIX capabilities, without libpcre, without SMI, with c-ares >>1.7.1, with Lua 5.1, without Python, with GnuTLS 2.10.3, with Gcrypt 1.4.6, >>without Kerberos, with GeoIP. >> >>Running on Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition Service Pack 1, build 3790, with >>WinPcap version 4.1.2 (packet.dll version 4.1.0.2001), based on libpcap > version >>1.0 branch 1_0_rel0b (20091008). >> >>Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 9.0 build 21022 >> >> >>On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:37:39 +1000 ronnie sahlberg wrote: >>>I have checked in to trunk an enhancement to add LOAD() stats to tshark >>too. >>> >>>LOAD() is shown as units of commands. >>>1.000 represents one I/O which is different from the GUI graph where >>>one I/O is represented as 1000 >>> >>> >>> >>>Looks like this: >>> >>>./tshark -n -r ../captures/smbwrite.cap -z >>>"io,stat,0.001,LOAD(smb.time)smb.time" -q >>> >>>... >>> >>>============================================================================ >>>IO Statistics >>>Interval: 0.001000 secs >>>Column #0: LOAD(smb.time)smb.time >>> | Column #0 | >>>Time | LOAD | >>>0000.000000-0000.001000 1.000000 >>>0000.001000-0000.002000 0.741000 >>>0000.002000-0000.003000 0.000000 >>> >>>... >>> >>> >>>have fun >>>ronnie sahlberg >>> >>>On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:15 PM, ronnie sahlberg >>><ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Hmm. ? tap-iostat.c for tshark does not support this. >>>> >>>> I must have had a private branch I forgot to commit. >>>> >>>> >>>> Ill have a look and see if i can locate it, or else I might just >>>> reimplement it again. >>>> >>>> regards >>>> ronnie sahlberg >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:46 AM, j.snelders <j.snelders@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Are you referring to the presentation at the Storage Developer Conference >>>>> 2008: >>>>> slide 69 - ?LOAD graphs? >>>>> >>>>> Hopefully Ronnie Sahlberg reads your question... >>>>> I too like to know the answer. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> Joke >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:05:27 +0300 Tal Bar-Or wrote: >>>>>>To: Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark load query >>>>> >>>>>>Hello j.snelders >>>>>> >>>>>>Thanks you for the response , i did looked into the man-pages and saw >>>its >>>>>>not specified but recently i read RonnieSahlberg Using Wireshark For >>>>>>Analyzing CIFS >>>>>>Traffic PDF. >>>>>> >>>>>>And in the PDF he gives examples of tshark query and specifying that >>this >>>>>>kind of query is possible with tshark "*QUEUE DEPTH analysis can also >>>be >>>>>>done by tshark*." so this is why i am looking for it >>>>>>need it for a script that i am writing. >>>>>> >>>>>>Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:34 PM, j.snelders <j.snelders@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Tal Bar-Or, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> According to the man-pages this option is only available in Wireshark >>>>> and >>>>>>> not in TShark. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.wireshark.org/docs/man-pages/wireshark.html >>>>>>> "advanced..." If Unit:advanced... is selected the window will display >>>>> two >>>>>>> more controls for each of the five graphs. One control will be a menu >>>>> where >>>>>>> the type of calculation can be selected from SUM,COUNT,MAX,MIN,AVG >>and >>>>>>> LOAD, >>>>>>> and one control, textbox, where the name of a single display filter >>>field >>>>>>> can be specified. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.wireshark.org/docs/man-pages/tshark.html >>>>>>> io,stat can also do much more statistics and calculate COUNT(), SUM(), >>>>>>> MIN(), >>>>>>> MAX(), and AVG() using a slightly different filter syntax: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ?[COUNT|SUM|MIN|MAX|AVG](<field>)<filter> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My best >>>>>>> Joke >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 14:33:54 +0300 Tal Bar-Or wrote: >>>>>>> >Hello all, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >I am trying to produce same query as sown in image with tshark. >>>>>>> >Please advice >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >Thanks >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >-- >>>>>>> >Tal Bar-or > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users > mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >
- References:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark load query
- From: j.snelders
- Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark load query
- From: j.snelders
- Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark load query
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark load query
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-users] Mac OSX and GnuTLS
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark load query
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-users] About capturing wireshark log with stop criteria
- Index(es):