Wireshark · Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] MSS=1262

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] MSS=1262

From: Hansang Bae <for_list_hbae@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:09:35 -0500

On 12/14/2010 3:23 AM, vincent paul wrote:

Hi All,

Is there any rationale ( security "protocol" or something...) to use MSS= 1212, 1260 or 1262?

Regards,

Vincent

Like Sake said, it could be folks who are worried about MTU issues. There should be a law passed to force everyone to get path mtu discovery to work!

Between IPSec, GRE, IPSEC+GRE, etc., it's not unusual to see MSS in the 1300 range.

References:
- [Wireshark-users] A way to see how many diffrent files are acessed using SMB/CIFS
  - From: Hime Marko
- Re: [Wireshark-users] A way to see how many diffrent files are acessed using SMB/CIFS
  - From: Martin Visser
- [Wireshark-users] MSS=1262
  - From: vincent paul

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] about Packet loss in wireshark
Next by Date: [Wireshark-users] TLSv1 decode problem
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] MSS=1262
Next by thread: [Wireshark-users] Help: Wireshark Crash--Error:lua5.1.dll Offset:0000c572
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread