Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] FTP Timeout Troubleshooting
From: "Jonathan S. Abrams" <hociman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:19:14 -0400
On 5/9/10 5/9/1011:49 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
Jonathan S. Abrams wrote:
Hello,

I am trying to troubleshoot an issue with connecting to an FTP server,
and have captured some packets that match a theory I have that the issue
is related to a timeout.  I am hoping that someone can either explain to
me what this data means or point me in the right direction towards
interpreting it.

When I initiated a connection to the FTP server in question, the
following packets caught my attention.

No.     Time        Source                Destination           Protocol
Info
23 10.212754  SERVER          ME       TCP      ftp>  49497 [ACK]
Seq=336 Ack=33 Win=524280 Len=0 TSV=113977199 TSER=777016821

No.     Time        Source                Destination           Protocol
Info
       24 11.057690   SERVER          ME        TCP      57314>  ident
[SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460

No.     Time        Source                Destination           Protocol
Info
       25 19.073737   SERVER          ME        TCP      57314>  ident
[SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460

No.     Time        Source                Destination           Protocol
Info
       26 35.105752   SERVER          ME        TCP      57314>  ident
[SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460

No.     Time        Source                Destination           Protocol
Info
       27 40.232279   SERVER         ME        FTP-DATA FTP Data: 85 bytes

No.     Time        Source                Destination           Protocol
Info
       28 40.232321  ME        SERVER          TCP      49497>  ftp [ACK]
Seq=33 Ack=421 Win=524280 Len=0 TSV=777017121 TSER=113977499

Here is why I think it is a timeout issue.  I am using Mac OS X, and
when I use Transmit to connect to this server, it takes about 31 seconds
to connect, but it does connect.  Transmit does not have a timeout
preference that I can find, so as long as I wait patiently, it
connects.  If I use Cyberduck, with its defaults, it will not connect.
If I change the Cyberduck timeout preference to 31 seconds, it does
connect.  If you look at the times on the packets above, you will see
the first packet I pasted here has a time of 10.212754.  The next packet
coming from ME going to the SERVER occurs at 40.232321, which is more
than 30 seconds after the first server packet.  As such, if I don't
adjust Cyberduck's default timeout preference to a higher value,
Cyberduck does not connect.  This packet capture was done using
Cyberduck, with its timeout preference set to 31 seconds, so I was able
to connect successfully.

Ultimately what I would like to do is get the time between packet 23 and
packet 28 to be less than 30 seconds.  This way nobody will have to
adjust their timeout preference if they are using Cyberduck to connect
to this server.  Does any of the packet data here suggest what I might
be able to do to achieve that?  Any insights are appreciated.
The timeout occurs because the FTP server is sending "IDENT" requests
to your system and getting no reply.

In the above the server tried 3 times with no response before finally
proceeding with the connection.

Google something like "FTP Server" "Ident" and you'll find lot's of info.

I'm not at all familiar with MAC OS X (and using FTP clients on same); I
suspect you may need to somehow have the OS send a "reject" reply when
the IDENT request is received (rather than ignoring the request).
Thank you for the response. I was able to configure the FTP server to not issue IDENT requests by using the information at http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20050223231518462.

I am still having a 30+ second delay between the moment I supply login credentials and the moment the directory listing is displayed. While looking for how to turn off IDENT requests, I found a post suggesting that the delay could be due to a PTR lookup. While the server has a PTR record, the PTR record is not the same as the A record. Could that contribute to the delay as well?

Thanks for reading!

Jonathan S. Abrams