On 5/16/2010 9:28 PM, mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Sometimes, I just want to get a quick view of what's going on so monitor for a while but the logging is what seems to use up all of the system resources after a while.
A different tool might provide you with a decent ongoing overview of
network activity. When customers are interested in this functionality, I
have them run NTOP, and instruct them to turn up a machine running
wireshark when they feel the need to drill down to byte/bit-level details.
On Sat, 15 May 2010 12:16:06 -0700, M Holt wrote:
Can you just use dumpcap with a ring buffer? Then stop the capture once
the event you are looking for is seen:
http://www.wireshark.org/docs/man-pages/dumpcap.html
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:02 AM, mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Any way of monitoring only, without a capture, until I need to capture?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list<wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-
request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
#avg_ls_inline_popup { position:absolute; z-index:9999; padding: 0px 0px;
margin-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px; width: 240px; overflow: hidden; word-
wrap: break-word; color: black; font-size: 10px; text-align: left; line-
height: 13px;}
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list<wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
