The installer definitely said it was installing it but I don't see it anywhere. Maybe I'll re-install and see what happens.
On Thu, 13 May 2010 16:32:50 -0700, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
> Did you install WinPcap? WinPcap must be installed in order to capture. Do
>
> the NICs get listed in wireshark?
>
> GV
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 4:30 PM
> To: "wireshark-users" <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] One NIC on public side
>
>> Ok, just noticed that on new system, after installing wireshark, there are
>> no capture protocols on either nic. Guess that's a lead.
>>
>> On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:43:23 -0500, mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> Just wanting to understand what I'm doing. Always good to learn rather
>>> than
>>> simply being told :).
>>>
>>>> MS client gets disabled if you disable TCP/IP. QoS can be disabled as
>>>> well.
>>>> The network monitors can be left on.
>>>>
>>> Because it is a netbios based service, which rides on tcp/ip?
>>>
>>>> You are disabling TCP/IP on the public NIC. The LAN NIC will have its
>>>> own
>>>> IP
>>>> address, the public one will not. As far as "safely connect" is
>>>> concerned,
>>>> it depends on what you mean by "safely".
>>>>
>>> Yes, the server has two NICs. I have one connected on the LAN side for
>>> server admin, etc, the other is connected to a hub which has the WAN
>>> connections coming into it, just before the firewall. I want to see what
>>> hits us before the firewall does anything with it. It helps a lot when
>>> trying to figure out various problems.
>>>
>>> What do I mean by safely? Meaning that public cannot gain access to the
>>> server in some way. I mean, the setup bypasses the firewall so sure
>>> don't
>>> want someone being able to gain access into the lan somehow.
>>>
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-
>>> users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
>>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>>> mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>>
>> mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
