Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Why redundant frames?
From: Tony Anecito <adanecito@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Hi George, Many thanks for the feedback. When I have access to the system I will let you know. The network path is from my client app through a DLink 1Gbps switch up to my router then back again to the same system as the client since the app server is on that box. So I am assuming what you are talking about is on my windows box and that I should use something like TCP optimizer to check that setting. Best Regards, -Tony --- On Wed, 10/14/09, George Peaslee <gpeaslee@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: George Peaslee <gpeaslee@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Why redundant frames? > To: "Community support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 10:04 AM > A couple things come to mind. > > In your TCP options field of the handshake, what is the > Maximum segment > size? > > Is there a device that is setting a smaller MTU in the path > such as a > router? (Path MTU Discovery) > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Anecito" <adanecito@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "Community support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:43 AM > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Why redundant frames? > > > Hi All, > > More info. Each frame in wireshark is listed as having > 539bytes captured and > on the wire. My MTU is set to 1500 byte packets so if this > is a > fragmentation of data why would the data be split into two > frames when one > should have at least used two packets within a frame? > > Sorry for the questions I am a newbe to this level of > analysis. > > Many Thanks, > -Tony > > --- On Wed, 10/14/09, Tony Anecito <adanecito@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > From: Tony Anecito <adanecito@xxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [Wireshark-users] Why redundant frames? > > To: "Wireshark Users" <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 9:03 AM > > Hi All, > > > > I am analyzing some traffic for my app using > Wireshark. I > > captured a single request from my app to a web service > and > > noticed that there appeared to be a redundancy in two > > frames. I am seeing something called a "TCP segment of > a > > reassembled PDU" and then my Post being sent from the > source > > (my client app) to the destination (web service). And > the > > same sequence coming back from the destination (web > service) > > to the source (my client app). > > > > Does anyone know why the TCP segment of a reassembled > PDU > > is be sent and then coming back? It looks like it > contains > > the same data or payload. > > > > Thanks, > > -Tony > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users > > > > mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users > > mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users > > mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >
- References:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Why redundant frames?
- From: George Peaslee
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Why redundant frames?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Why redundant frames?
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] M2m pluging & Wimax
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Why redundant frames?
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-users] SMB parser and TCP retransmission issues
- Index(es):