Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Nano Second Time format
From: j.snelders@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:13 +0200
Hi Ambika, This is what Wireshark/TShark shows: $ tshark -r nano_demo.pcap -T fields -e frame.number -e frame.time -e frame.time_delta -e frame.len -E header=y frame.number frame.time frame.time_delta frame.len 1 Aug 24, 2009 12:38:47.-11626900 0.000000000 222 2 Aug 24, 2009 12:38:47.-75559000 0.040710000 242 3 Aug 24, 2009 12:38:47.186172000 0.1937279000 212 4 Aug 24, 2009 12:38:47.-14303070 0.1002940296 232 5 Aug 24, 2009 12:38:47.-42778700 0.1002520000 272 6 Aug 24, 2009 12:38:47.563902000 0.991689000 202 7 Aug 24, 2009 12:38:47.157823200 0.1014330000 262 8 Aug 24, 2009 12:38:47.-73430400 0.1982431296 192 I have no idea why Wireshark shows invalid frame times. Expert Message: Arrival Time: Fractional second out of range (0-1000000000) Anyone else does? Best regards Joan On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:31:22 +0530 Ambika Pr. Tripathy wrote: >Hi Joan, > >Thanks for your replay. I can open the file without any error. But the time >stamp column shows negative values for some rows. But the nano second and >second format is perfect in my file used by one of my application . > >like my application shows the time as >24:08:2009::16:08:47.953366470 len:222 >24:08:2009::16:08:47.953407180 len:242 >24:08:2009::16:08:47.955344460 len:212 >24:08:2009::16:08:47.956347400 len:232 >24:08:2009::16:08:47.957349920 len:272 >24:08:2009::16:08:47.958341610 len:202 >24:08:2009::16:08:47.959355940 len:262 >24:08:2009::16:08:47.961338370 len:192 > > >where are the wireshark shows time stamp of these files as attached with >this mail. > > >br, >Ambika > > >>-- Original Message -- >>Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:26:25 +0200 >>From: j.snelders@xxxxxxxxxx >>To: "Community support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Nano Second Time format >>Reply-To: Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >>Hi Ambika, >> >>What is the problem? >>Can't you open the capture file? >>Do you get een error message? >> >>Don't you see the nanoseconds? >>Go to View -> Time Display Format -> Select Nanoseconds: 0.123456789 >> >>HTH >>Joan >> >>On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:04:24 +0530 Ambika Tripathy wrote >>> >>>I am facing problem when opening one .pcap file with nano second time >stamp >>>in PCAP header using wireshark Version 1.1.3 (SVN Rev 27807). Is it possible >>>to open it using the same version or there is any other version which >>>support the format. >>> >>> >>> >>>Thanks in advance for your response. >>> >>> >>> >>>Br, >>> >>>Ambika Prasad Tripathy >>> >>>Call@ +91 94375 47730 >> >> >> >> >> >>___________________________________________________________________________ >>Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users >>Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users >> mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > >Ambika Prasad Tripathy > >NetHawk Networks India Pvt. Ltd. >Mob: +91-94375 47730 >mail: ambika.tripathy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >web: www.nethawk.fi > > > >Bijlage: nano_demo.pcap >
Attachment:
nano_demo.pcap
Description: application/pcap
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Nano Second Time format
- From: M Holt
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Nano Second Time format
- References:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Nano Second Time format
- From: Ambika Pr. Tripathy
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Nano Second Time format
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Nano Second Time format
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Nano Second Time format
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Nano Second Time format
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Nano Second Time format
- Index(es):