Great info - thanks!
-Samson
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hansang Bae
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 12:27 PM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Network Analysis Training
Samson Martinez wrote:
> Hello folks,
> I'm thinking about taking some network analysis training sometime
during
> this year and was wondering if anyone that participates in this forum
> had taken similar formal training and, if so, if they were satisfied
> with the results. Or is this more of a "better off learning through
> school of hard knocks" type of knowledge?
I think it depends on your level of comfort with Ethernet/TCP/IP. I'm
assuming here that's what you're interested in. The problem with
protocol analysis classes that I've seen or saw online, were that they
were very basic. Even the classes defined as "expert" weren't so expert
level. Herein lies the problem. How do you classify "expert" "medium"
"beginner"?
My recommendation would be to read as much as you possibly can to absorb
the academic parts of the protocol. Comer and Stevens are both great
books to start with. Then you can move on to general networking topic
from the likes of Computer Networks by Tanenbaum or
Interconnections...by Perlman.
Once you have the fundamentals, you can tackle troubleshooting and
learning to read trace files. There's still a lot of "art" than
"science" in doing protocol analysis.
Finally, check out the sharkfest presentations as you can pick up a lot
of good tips/tricks of the trade.
--
Thanks,
Hansang
________________________________________________________________________
___
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list
<wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
