I had a similar issue with a db
application taking 60 seconds or more to open up over a T1 connection. I
remember reading, but cannot remember where, haven’t been able to find
it, and I can’t remember if I was researching the same error message, that
the extra back and forth that you’re seeing has something to do with SMB checking
alternate data streams on the targeted file. Rather than troubleshoot
that, I was able to offer the users an offline solution where the clients would
sync at the end of the session, rather than access all the info up front.
Perhaps a solution like that would help? From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Barry Constantine I would google the error message; sorry. From:
wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of St Onge,Adam 33ms. Thanks, Adam From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Barry Constantine What is the latency between the two hosts
(approximately)? From:
wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of St Onge,Adam I am having a problem with slow response over an oc3 wan
link using Microsoft office documents, specifically excel documents. The users
are attempting to open roughly a 100kb file and takes approx 90 seconds to
open. I sniffed the traffic and have been combing through the frames with
Wireshark but I see a confusing pattern. The workstation frequently attempts
“NT Create Andx Request” and the server then immediately returns
with “Error: Status_Access_Denied”. This pattern repeats over
and over again during this conversation and I suspect it may have something to
do with the slow response these users are experiencing. I have spent a lot of
time on google trying to determine this and keep coming up empty handed… Does anyone have any insight as to what may be going on
here? Thanks, Adam ============================================================================== This communication, together with any attachments hereto or links contained herein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments hereto or links herein, from your system.
============================================================================== The Travelers e-mail system made this annotation on 04/14/08, 21:24:38.
============================================================================== This communication, together with any attachments hereto or links contained herein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments hereto or links herein, from your system.
============================================================================== The Travelers e-mail system made this annotation on 04/15/08, 12:23:25.
|
- References:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] SMB Question
- From: Barry Constantine
- Re: [Wireshark-users] SMB Question
- From: St Onge,Adam
- Re: [Wireshark-users] SMB Question
- From: Barry Constantine
- Re: [Wireshark-users] SMB Question
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] SMB Question
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Is it a bug with Wireshark?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] SMB Question
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] SMB Question
- Index(es):