Prasad,
Please open a new bug to track this problem and attach an example packet that exhibits the problem.
Thanks,
Martin
On Jan 25, 2008 8:24 PM, Prasad Shenoy <
prasad.shenoy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Martin -
I should have included the details in my initial email. Sorry about that.
I am using 0.99.7 on Win XP, the latest download from yesterday.
I looked at bug # 2185 and even followed the command line suggestion but with my own capture file instead of the one attached to the report. The problem still persists.
What is your advice in this situation?
Thanks
PrasadOn Jan 25, 2008 3:11 PM, Martin Mathieson <
martin.r.mathieson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I fixed a but matching this description around 2 weeks ago (to fix reported bug 2185). Could you please test with a later build?
Hope this helps,
Martin
Good people -
I am new to this list so I apologize for loose etiquettes, if any.
I would like to report a bug related to Wireshark PDML export feature. While looking at a .pdml export of a recent capture, I noticed a tag mismatch for element <proto> and several occurrences of this mismatch in a single .pdml file.
Has anyone noticed or run into this before?
Any help and guidance is highly appreciated
Thanks,
Prasad
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
--
Prasad
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users