Wireshark · Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Tons of ARP packets...?

[IchBin <weconsultants@xxxxxxxxx>]

Small, James wrote:
> Dooh!  That's a major bummer.  Perhaps Zone Alarm then?  Or...
>
> How about this for a wish item - the ability to filter and/or identify
> network traffic by process name/ID.  Based on what I've seen from the
> Sysinternals tools I believe it may be possible.  What do you think?

Thanks James for you help. I have been looking at another tool called 
WhatsRunning which does the same. I see the UDP start and stop but there 
is no associated program that is involved in that process. Or the 
monitor can no capture it but it does for all other connections.

See later remarks in thread.

> --Jim
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > > If this is a Windows machine, One thing you can try is installing
> > > ZoneAlarm of Kerio's personal firewall.
> > ...and then possibly give up on using Wireshark to capture packets on
> > that machine - Kerio and WinPcap appear to get into arguments on a
> > number of occasions:
> http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/winpcap-users/2007-July/001975.html
> > There have been other reports of problems with Kerio and WinPcap on
> > the winpcap-users list.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users