Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] bad handling of DHCP option 90?
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: "Stefan Puiu" <stefan.puiu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:00:56 +0300
Replying to an older email, since I set email delivery options to 'no
email'. I've attached two sample DHCPv4 capture files for testing
purposes.

The first has a proper option 90 in the DHCPOFFER (format-wise, the
HMAC is bogus), the second has a totally bogus option 90 (which
wireshark warns about).

Stefan.

On 4/24/07, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

What about the presentation of the HMAC MD5 Hash? That's got to be
conditional as well.
Please refer to the SVN version, your line numbers seem to indicate an
older revision of the file.

Thanx,
Jaap

Attachment: dhcp4_auth7.cap
Description: Binary data

Attachment: dhcp4_auth5.cap
Description: Binary data