I have a Barracuda 600 if you want to test, too.  
 
Frank
Well, I printed the report (should've kept a digital one!) and the 
spyware scantool from the Web-Filter appliance is clearly stating otherwise! I'm 
gonna rescan my laptop tonight, and post a follow-up 
tomorrow...
Ion
2007/4/19, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I 
  received a response about the false positive issue.  According 
  to
Barracuda, it shouldn't be possible.
Their response 
  follows:
--------
Gerald,
We investigated your claim and found 
  that our Web Filter could not be 
blocking the dll as 
  described.  Please see the attached explanation from
one of our 
  Spyware engineers.
We appreciate your feedback and please feel free to 
  contact me directly
if you have any additional questions. 
  
Thanks,
Sean
--
Sean Heiney
Product 
  Manager
Barracuda Networks, Inc.
www.barracuda.com
Office: 
  +x.xxx.xxx.xxxx
xxxxxxx (at) barracuda.com
-----Original 
  Message-----
From: Dave Michmerhuizen
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 
  4:03 PM
Subject: RE: wireshark
wireshark is the successor to 
  ethereal.
We don't have an sbus.dll in our spyware database.
In 
  any case, we don't match on file names - we match on MD5 hashes 
  of
files.
Our definition for Adware.Toolbar.ILookup.Sbus has no 
  associated files.
It only triggers on outboud traffic to toolbar.searchbus.com.
If the 
  customer is seeing a block message (ie, a message in their
browser) with 
  Adware.Toolbar.ILookup.Sbus on it, that would be... odd,
unless they were 
  navigating to that url. 
If the customer is seeing infection activity 
  in their WebFilter UI -
that is not file related.  The WebFilter 
  only cares about traffic.  An
entry on the infection activity tab 
  that reads
Adware.Toolbar.ILookup.Sbus should be the result of outbound 
  traffic to
toolbar.searchbus.com.   If 
  there is doubt about that I can usually
verify it by looking at the 
  WebFilter through the support tunnel.  It's 
best to coordinate 
  something like that with someone on the WebFilter
support 
  team.
-----Original Message-----
From: gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 
  Tuesday, April 17, 2007 4:45 PM
The message has been included 
  below.
Username of poster: Gerald 
  Combs
----------------------------
Message Subject: Wireshark sbus.dll 
  false positive?
I've received a couple of reports from users that the 
  Barracuda Web
Filter has been triggering a false positives for each release 
  of
[url="" href="http://www.wireshark.org/]Wireshark[/url"> 
  http://www.wireshark.org/]Wireshark[/url].  Wireshark's 
  S-Bus
plugin is named "sbus.dll", and the Web Filter apparently thinks this 
  is
the ILookup.Sbus worm.  One such report can be found 
  here:
[url]http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200704/msg00112.html
[/url]
Can 
  someone at Barracuda confirm and fix 
  this?
----------------------------------
Barracuda Networks 
  makes the best spam firewalls and web filters. 
www.barracuda.com
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users 
  mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users