Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] SEQ/ACK analysis
From: "ronnie sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 04:03:53 +0000
The field for showing how long it took to ACK a datasegment was "lost"
a while ago when i did a quite nessecary rewrite of the seq/ack
analysis code to clean it up.
(it was "lost" because i thought it was not one of the fundamentally
important fields   and i forgot to add it back.)

Ill try to look into adding it back together with a field that tells
which packet it acks data for.
I wont have time to do so today or tomorrow so please, if this field
is important to you, keep pinging me every once in a while and ill add
it back when priorities allow.



On 10/12/06, Stephen Fisher <stephentfisher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:25:33AM +0200, Peter Daum wrote:

> I just upgraded to wireshark 0.99.3.
>
> In older versions of ethereal, there used to be a section labeled
> SEQ/ACK analysis with links to the packet an ACK is referring to. Is
> there an option somewhere to get this information back in current
> versions (or any other easy way to keep track of ACKs)?

There is a TCP preference to "Analyze TCP sequence numbers," which I
have enabled but it only shows up sometimes.  It does show up if there
is something like a TCP window update.  What version of Ethereal were
you using where you saw it on every TCP segment?


Steve

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users