Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Lost packets can not ping my machine onmynetwork
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:54:02 +0200 (CEST)
Hi guys, shall I spill the beans?
Or are we letting David find out for himself?

Nhaa, that's not nice. So here it goes.

David,

If you reply to a message from a mailing list and you want that reply to
be private, don't address the mailinglist.

Now that the message is sent, you already know it can't be withdrawn, I've
explained you that. Hopefully the filtering you applied caused no private
data to leak out.

Thanx,
Jaap

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, wrote:

> Hi Stephen
>
> I have filtered the info as you have requested and attached the files for
> you .. I thought I had better sent this to your private email address as in
> the last posting I transmitted my email account details which I have had to
> change ( without realising this application captures your machine based on
> what is open ) .. Fast learning curve :-))
> M1= 192.168.1.64
> M2= 192.168.1.100
> Both M1 & M2 are connected via a Router hard connect via LAN Ethernet cables
> ( Router 2wire HG 1800 )
> M3 = 192.168.1.101 which is wireless and has no cable connected to the
> router but connects via the routers wi-fi
> Router is 192.168.1.254
> Interesting that I seemed to get one reply from M1 when I pinged from M3 ..
> But I saw 4 lost packets in cmd no replies when I looked at it ???
>
> Am happy to resume the conversation via the support list after this post.
>
> Ps thanks for getting back to me .. I really want to crack this as I see no
> reason why I can not ping the main machine
> I can share files etc etc .. But NO ping to M1 ???
>
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher
> Sent: 12 October 2006 05:05
> To: Community support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Lost packets can not ping my machine
> onmynetwork
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 02:22:28PM +0100, wrote:
>
> > But I do not know how to read the info & from what machine to what ..
> > I pinged M2 to M1 and saw some bad check sums ?? I really need some
> > help with this so I can attempt to solve this
>
> > Yes I have installed Wireshark/Ethereal on M1,M2+M3 ...I Pinged M1
> > from M2 .. but I am a little overwhelmed at all the info ... I have
> > sent you snap shot of the files that M2 received after pinging M1 and
> > that M1 received after being pinged from M2 ..I also pinged M2 from M1
> > on the order stated... I hope you do not mind and that you might be
> > able to help me track this problem down I tried to cut and paste this
> > info but it is not at all legible
>
> Thanks for attaching the capture files so I can view them in easily in
> Wireshark :) and sorry for the delay in getting back to you.  Don't
> worry about the bad checksums, those are on TCP packets that we aren't
> concerned about in this ping issue.  To make it easier to troubleshoot
> this issue, type "icmp" and hit enter in the Filter field in the top of
> Wireshark so it shows only icmp (ping) traffic.  Then you can more
> easily see that the captures show the 5 ping requests
> leaving 192.168.1.100 and entering 192.168.1.64 and .64 does not send
> out a response.  Which IP belongs to M1 and which to M2?
>
>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>