Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rp
From: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:49:07 +0100
> On 21. Mar 2020, at 23:10, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Currently, on GitHub, there's a "pcapng" team:
>> https://github.com/pcapng
> 
>> with one repository containing the pcapng specification, and a "the-tcpdump-group" team:
> 
>> https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group
>> with repositories for libpcap, tcpdump, and the tcpdump.org Web site.
> 
>> It makes sense to me to keep those specifications on a site such as
>> GitHub; GitHub comes to mind first because that's where pcapng
>> currently is.
> 
>> 1) add them as repositories to the pcapng team;
> 
>> 1) has the slight disadvantage that the name for the team suggests it's
>> for pcapng only; it appears that teams can be renamed:
> 
> ...
> 
>> Were we to rename it, I don't know what would be a good new name.
> 
> I'm good with pcapng, because I also have no other suggestion.
> I would like to restart the opsawg work on an IETF specification for this.
I would support this. However, last time I tried this, I was not successful.
There were not very interested in defining a file format...
Maybe things have changed, but I don't know.


Best regards
Michael
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe