Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Lua minimum version
From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 14:57:54 -0800
On Dec 19, 2018, at 2:05 PM, Peter Wu <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> IMO that commit should be reverted,

IMO this is unproven.

> it extends the public Lua API just
> to workaround an issue on Windows. We already override dofile/loadfile,

Which is *itself* a mistake, as far as I'm concerned.  Why should all calls to dofile()/loadfile() look in the Wireshark configuration directories?

> so I'm investigating whether that can be patched in an appropriate way.
> (Aside from that there is also io.open, so the current fix is already
> incomplete.)

That's a *separate* problem; the bug in question is an issue with the "load Lua code" API, which, for better or worse, is a separate API from the "do file I/O" API.

There's more than one place where we're getting bitten by the different ways that non-ASCII pathnames are handled on UN*X and Windows; see, for example, bug 1827:

	https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1827

in which libsmi uses fopen() on a UTF-8 path.