Aha – whilst what I’ve written below is true, it doesn’t accurately reflect the issue. If I start Wireshark and double click on a file in the recently opened list, part of the processing is this: cf_open() calls ws_epan_new() calls epan_new() calls init_dissection() calls wmem_enter_file_scope() which sets file_scope->in_scope = TRUE; All of the above takes place before my new block reader is called. If I start Wireshark, use Ctl-O and then double click on a file in the file explorer dialogue, there is no call to wmem_enter_file_scope() before my block reader is called. I believe this is a bug. The two file opens should be consistent in the setting of file_scope->in_scope = TRUE, and hence the scope of wmem_file_scope().
Thanks and regards…Paul From: Paul Offord
Hi, Still working on my new block reader. To recap, I’ve defined a new pcapng block type and written a dissector. The first thing I have to do is read the new block type, and Wireshark provides a framework to do this. In the new block reader
I define some space like this: tdb_namespace = wmem_strdup_printf(wmem_file_scope(), "%s", option_block->option_data); Eventually the wmem_strdup_printf(…) execution calls this function: void * wmem_alloc(wmem_allocator_t *allocator, const size_t size) { if (allocator == NULL) { return g_malloc(size); } if (!allocator->in_scope) // debug code while (FALSE); // debug code g_assert(allocator->in_scope); if (size == 0) { return NULL; } return allocator->walloc(allocator->private_data, size); } The g_assert intermittently fails. If I open one file containing the new block, allocator->in_scope is true. If I call another it’s false. The block read is called before we start dissecting the contents with the dissector code.
Thanks and regards…Paul ______________________________________________________________________ This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Advance Seven Ltd. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. Advance Seven Ltd. Registered in England & Wales numbered 2373877 at Endeavour House, Coopers End Lane, Stansted, Essex CM24 1SJ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________ |
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] allocator->in_scope
- From: Evan Huus
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] allocator->in_scope
- From: Paul Offord
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] allocator->in_scope
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] allocator->in_scope
- From: Paul Offord
- [Wireshark-dev] allocator->in_scope
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] allocator->in_scope
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] allocator->in_scope
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-dev] allocator->in_scope
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] allocator->in_scope
- Index(es):