Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] formatted time in dissector
From: Michael Mann <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 10:40:18 -0400
I thought one of the other reasons Jaap's suggestion is good is that when you try to filter with that field, you will get your desired format as the filter text.  Right now the field displays as "mm:ss.nnnnnn" in the packet details, but will still show up as  "ssss.nnnnnnnnn" if you try to filter on it.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, May 6, 2016 2:18 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] formatted time in dissector

Hi,

You've done this the right ways, for a single instance representation.
If this is a representation that would be needed more often (as in, is commonly
used in various dissectors) it can be added to the ftypes system (see
epan/ftypes), in this case ftype-time.c. I could image it being handled via a
new FIELDDISPLAY for FIELDTYPE FT_RELATIVE_TIME.

Thanks,
Jaap


On 06-05-16 01:59, Alan Partis wrote:
> In the DIS dissector (packet-dis.c), I have constructed an nstime_t var
> and populated its .secs and .nsecs fields with calculated values from the
> protocol buffer. I'd like to have this display in the packet dissection
> pane in so-called formatted time i.e. "mm:ss.nnnnnn" where 'nnnnnn'
> displays to microsecond accuracy.
>
> Right now, the dissector simply calls proto_tree_add_time() and the time
> is displayed as a number of seconds with nanoseconds i.e. "ssss.nnnnnnnnn"
> with the final 3 digits always showing '000' (because the nstime_t
> structure only hold a microsecond accuracy).
>
> To achieve what I want, I've changed the dissector to instead call
> proto_tree_add_time_format_value(..., "%02u:%02u.%06u", mm, ss, usec);
>
> While that produces the desired result, it doesn't feel quite right to me.
> Is there another way to get a proto_tree_add_time_xxx() function to print
> automagically the format I want? Or did I actually do it right in the
> first place?
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Alan Partis
> thundernet development group

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe