Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Moving codecs to libwireshark or libwsutil?

[Bálint Réczey <balint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

2015-12-02 21:25 GMT+01:00 Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> 2015-11-30 20:15 GMT+01:00 Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>
>> On Nov 30, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Yes I should have been clearer in my initial description.
>> > My suggestion with an extra parameter giving the hash table address is
>> > also working fine, so I do not have a strong feeling either way (the changed
>> > parameter is faster to do but might not be the best long term solution).
>>
>> Unless there's some compelling reason for them *not* to be in a dynamic
>> library, I think making libcodec a dynamic library the best long-term
>> solution.
>>
>> > If possible I would like to have this fixed for Wireshark 2.0.1 but I
>> > wonder if such change is compatible with our usual policy to keep APIs
>> > constant (does it apply when they are buggy?).
>>
>> Making it a dynamic library wouldn't change the API.
>
>
> Done: https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/12385/1
The discussion continued in the review, please join it if you feel so there.

Cheers,
Balint