And https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11149 is
potentially the same issue for 1.12 although it seems to have only
happened the once.
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11147 and its many
> duplicates suggest a similar issue with the master buildbot.
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Jeff Morriss
> <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> There have been plenty of fuzz failures from the 1.10 branch in the past few
>> months, including:
>>
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11050
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11065
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11077
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11090
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11094
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11150
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11239
>>
>> All of the captures associated with those bugs run fine for me. The last
>> one's error:
>>
>>>
>>> /home/wireshark/builders/wireshark-1.10-fuzz/fuzztest/build/.libs/lt-tshark:
>>> error while loading shared libraries: libwireshark.so.3: failed to map
>>> segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory
>>
>>
>> really supports the theory that it's not the software that has the problem
>> but the buildbot itself.
>>
>> Is there something wrong with the box?
>>
>> In the mean time I'll close all those bugs as WORKSFORME.
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
