Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] master 7ced085: emem is dead! Long live wmem!

[Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx>]

It wasn't an extremely interesting page (IMO)...  It mostly described 
the idea behind the project and its (undoubtedly waaay out of date) status.

On 02/04/15 10:49, Maynard, Chris wrote:
> Might that be a little hasty to remove the EMEM page so soon?  I'm sure there are developers still working with older releases that are using emem.  I don't know what information was there or how useful it was compared to the various README's, but presumably it provided additional information beyond what was available anywhere else.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:45 AM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] master 7ced085: emem is dead! Long live wmem!
>
> So I deleted the EMEMification page from the wiki but I'm not sure what to do with the Canary page:
>
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Canary
>
> It looks like wmem does use canaries (under some circumstances?) so maybe it shouldn't be deleted.  But I'm not familiar enough with what wmem is doing to rewrite it either...
>
> On 02/04/15 10:04, Evan Huus wrote:
> > Woohoo!
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Wireshark code review
> > <code-review-do-not-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > URL:
> > > https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=7
> > > ced085550d030ea10525d650c8d5d8dc7c99684
> > > Submitter: Anders Broman (a.broman58@xxxxxxxxx)
> > > Changed: branch: master
> > > Repository: wireshark
> > >
> > > Commits:
> > >
> > > 7ced085 by Michael Mann (mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
> > >
> > >       emem is dead! Long live wmem!