Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] GTK+: Revert back to 2.24.14-1.1 on Win64.
Correct. Is there a reason we don't use a unique name for the GTK+
library directory, e.g. "gtk-2.24.23-1.1-win64ws" instead of "gtk2"? It
seems like that would avoid this sort of problem and simplify the Nmake
files a bit.
On 9/30/14 12:39 PM, Anders Broman wrote:
> But if I don't rerun setup I will build with the old GTK bundle, as
> that's what's unpacked into GTK dir - right?
>
> 2014-09-30 21:22 GMT+02:00 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>:
>
> On 9/30/14 4:54 AM, Anders Broman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Don’t we need a new setup TAG as well for this to take effect?
>
> gtk+-bundle_2.24.14-1.1_win64ws.zip wasn't removed from the repository
> before tags/2014-07-27 was created, so it's part of that tag:
>
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/wireshark-win64-libs/tags/2014-07-27/packages/
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>