Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] master 53957d8: Go back to non-verbose M
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 10:43:10 +0200
There is no need to change CMakeLists.txt for this kind of stuff:
Just use "make VERBOSE=1". That's how I do my builds to be always verbose
although the default is non-verbose.
In case you are using another make system then I don't know how to achieve
that.

Ciao
     Jörg

On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 06:30:29PM +0000, Wireshark code review wrote:
> URL: https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=53957d846c6831e943b70db5ae79bc750bf7397f
> Submitter: Guy Harris (guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
> Changed: branch: master
> Repository: wireshark
> 
> Commits:
> 
> 53957d8 by Guy Harris (guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
> 
>     Go back to non-verbose Makefiles.
>     
>     (The difference in question turned out to be that optimization wasn't
>     turned on for autotools builds but was turned on for CMake builds.
>     Comparing the compiler options also found some other differences that
>     should be cleaned up.)
>     
>     Change-Id: I2edb28dedc47fe10b3f68f25d3e302430b27bf46
>     Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/3386
>     Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     
> 
> Actions performed:
> 
>     from  3da89d6   Add missing macro parameter
>     adds  53957d8   Go back to non-verbose Makefiles.
> 
> 
> Summary of changes:
>  CMakeLists.txt |    7 -------
>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
>              mailto:wireshark-commits-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.