Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: Re: Storing Generated Code in Git [Was: master 9079e3a:
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:47:23 +0200
Hi Joerg

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:17:32PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
>> > >> So perhaps what we should do is:
>> > >>
>> > >>         not check generated code into Git;
>> > >>
>> > >>         put all generated code into the source tarballs.
>
> +2
>
>> > Presumably we should rebuild all the DCERPC files as well at buildtime
>> > then?
>
> YEs, once we have a version in our source that is actually capable of doing that.
> It doesn't build all files for me.
>
>> If that's possible, yes. I don't actually know how to generate them, so I
>> don't know how fast and/or cross-platform it is.
>
> See epan/dissectors/pidl/README on how to do that in tree (in theory).
>
Do you have (re)try pidl ? because never work for me... (and no found
how to fix...)
> Ciao
>    Jörg
>
>
> --
> Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe