Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Doubt related to rrc tables
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:14:08 +0100
2014-02-26 8:59 GMT+01:00 Rahul Rohit <rahul.rohit@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

Hi,

 

Why don’t we have rrc.proc.imsg  tables like ranap.proc.imsg or nbap.proc.imsg tables ??

on what criteria this tables are defined ??


Hi,

simply because RRC protocol has nothing to do with RANAP or NBAP protocols and does not describe the messages the same way. With RRC protocol, you need to know on which logical channel the message is transmitted and then the bit sequence allows you to identify the message.
NBAP/RANAP requires the use of tables to identify the message based on the message family (Initiating, SuccessfulOutcome, UnsuccessfulOutcome, Outcome) and a procedure code.

Pascal.