On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey <balint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi All & Gerald,
>
> 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if
>>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark or
>>> https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark is the right address to build
>>> the latest wireshark from source code.
>>>
>>> (If I understand it correctly this question is similar to "kernel" by
>>> Linus versus "kernel-next" by Stephen Rothwell - right ?)
>>
>> No, https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark was a read-only mirror of
>> the subversion repo and should be considered dead (I expect Gerald
>> will remove it at some point).
> I think it would be useful to keep it as a read-only mirror for
> browsing the code easily.
Why? It will have exactly the same contents as the main repository, so
there will be no difference between browsing one or the other.
> Gerald, could you please make it updated from Gerrit branches instead
> of deleting it?
>
> Cheers,
> Balint
>
>>
>> Please use only https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
