On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:03 PM, <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On a related note, it seems like Gerrit encourages more comments within its
> interface when discussing a bug/enhancement then doing it Bugzilla (where
> all outside patches used to go through). It was (is) always nice to have a
> "masochist" (-bugs subscriber) interject something into a bug in Bugzilla
> they weren't necessarily "following". Does Gerrit create the need for yet
> another "list" to follow to get the same information?
Individuals can choose to watch "all comments" for a project in their
personal gerrit preferences. There shouldn't be a need for an actual
mailing list.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: alexis.lagoutte <alexis.lagoutte@xxxxxxxxx>; Developer support list for
> Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Mon, Feb 10, 2014 2:50 pm
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] -commits emails
>
> On 2/10/14 10:41 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
>>
>> And as of this morning (or perhaps slightly earlier) I've stopped
>> receiving them at all...?
>>
>> Yes, i confirm too...
>
> They've been mis-sent since Thursday. (It might help if the script were
> running in production mode instead of test mode.) There are 21 missing
> commits. I'll fix the script and resend the messages shortly.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
