Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git and line endings
From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 13:43:35 +0000
On 4 February 2014 13:18, Bálint Réczey <balint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
2014-02-04 Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx>:
I made a quick test and converting every file with CRLF-s to LF using>
>
>
> 2014-02-04 Graham Bloice <graham.bloice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> On 4 February 2014 11:18, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2014-02-04 Graham Bloice <graham.bloice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3 February 2014 22:50, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> with subversion we were using the native eol-style property. Now that
>>>>> we moved to git, would it make sense to commit a .gitattributes file with
>>>>> text=auto to avoid any issue between Linux and Windows development boxes?
>>>>> I faced tonight an issue with asn2wrs.py that generated the ASN.1
>>>>> dissector with CRLF line endings on my Windows machine (due to the use of
>>>>> Python open() function) while my checkout had LF line endings, leading to
>>>>> completely different files from git point of view.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There seems to be a lot of confusion around this aspect, possibly
>>>> because Windows is usually a second class citizen in the git world.
>>>>
>>>> Some other useful links:
>>>>
>>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/170961/whats-the-best-crlf-handling-strategy-with-git
>>>> https://help.github.com/articles/dealing-with-line-endings
>>>> http://adaptivepatchwork.com/2012/03/01/mind-the-end-of-your-line
>>>>
>>>> Even when the .gitattributes is correctly set it seems that someone will
>>>> have to re-normalise the repo (as in the GitHub article).
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I played a bit with .gitattributes after sending my email and could
>>> easily shoot me in the foot...
>>> I guess we cannot (should not) expect to have all Windows contributors to
>>> set the core.autocrlf=true setting before cloning Wireshark.
>>> Still I do not see any easy solution:
>>> - do one big commit introducing .gitattributes and re-normalising the
>>> repo, OR
>>> - put a big fat warning somewhere (in the documentation ?) stating that
>>> Windows users should set core.autocrlf=true before cloning, OR
>>> - modify all scripts like asn2wrs.py so that they are less smart and
>>> ouput LF line endings (assuming it is possible) and expect peaople that they
>>> did not activate autocrlf (sigh...)
>>>
>>> Only first option seems good to me (maybe there is a 4th option that I
>>> missed?).
>>> I just did a dry run and following the re-normalize procedure described
>>> on github only wireshark.sln file is impacted so it is not a massive commit.
>>> If there is a consensus I will do the change.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I know others differ, but IMHO the wireshark.sln file could be deleted
>> anyway. If the re-normalisation isn't too bad then go for that.
>
> +1
>>
>>
>> I'm a bit confused by the asn2wrs issues though. If they produce the
>> platform specific line endings for their output, then won't those be
>> normalised by git on commit (if the correct settings for git are applied)?
>
> On Linux asn1wrs.py produces LF line endings, while on Windows it produces
> CRLF line endings.
> Without having .gitattributes or core.autocrlf setting set to true locally,
> my working directory is having files with LF line endings but as soon as I
> want to update an ASN.1 dissector the file written is with CRLF. I have to
> manually change it back to LF...
> On Linux, both the working copy and asn2wrs.py output have LF line endings.
> I expect that we will have similar issues with other scripts than
> asn2wrs.py, thus my idea to do what seems to be the equivalent of the
> subversion eol-style native property.
>
> Pascal.
>
> PS: I do not like that much playing with line ending conversion like this,
> but this is how our repository was working previously and I do not master
> all the subtleties to get rid of it
the script at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1510798/trying-to-fix-line-endings-with-git-filter-branch-but-having-no-luck/1511273#1511273
Yielded a diff reasonable size:
commit 57bdccf83b9a6fc2d8db34e526d6635cd0eae207
Author: Balint Reczey <balint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Feb 4 14:10:41 2014 +0100
Fixed crlf issue
adns_dll.dep | 170 +++++++++++++-------------
adns_dll.rc | 220
+++++++++++++++++-----------------
epan/dissectors/packet-isakmp.c | 2 +-
epan/dissectors/pidl/initshutdown.cnf | 2 +-
epan/enterprise-numbers | 6 +-
image/expert_indicators.svg | 854
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------------------------------------
image/filetap.rc.in | 68 +++++------
image/toolbar/capture_interfaces_16.svg | 82 ++++++-------
image/toolbar/capture_interfaces_24.svg | 86 +++++++-------
image/toolbar/capture_options_16.svg | 58 ++++-----
image/toolbar/capture_options_24.svg | 60 +++++-----
image/toolbar/capture_options_alt1_16.svg | 74 ++++++------
image/toolbar/capture_options_alt1_24.svg | 74 ++++++------
image/toolbar/capture_pause_16.svg | 66 +++++------
image/toolbar/capture_pause_24.svg | 66 +++++------
image/toolbar/capture_restart_16.svg | 76 ++++++------
image/toolbar/capture_restart_16_alt1.svg | 56 ++++-----
image/toolbar/capture_restart_16_alt2.svg | 62 +++++-----
image/toolbar/capture_restart_16_alt3.svg | 56 ++++-----
image/toolbar/capture_restart_16_alt4.svg | 32 ++---
image/toolbar/capture_restart_24.svg | 74 ++++++------
image/toolbar/capture_restart_24_alt1.svg | 56 ++++-----
image/toolbar/capture_restart_24_alt2.svg | 62 +++++-----
image/toolbar/capture_restart_24_alt3.svg | 56 ++++-----
image/toolbar/capture_restart_24_alt4.svg | 32 ++---
image/toolbar/capture_stop_16_alt1.svg | 50 ++++----
image/toolbar/capture_stop_24_alt1.svg | 50 ++++----
plugins/opcua/plugin.rc.in | 68 +++++------
profiles/Bluetooth/colorfilters | 2 +-
profiles/Classic/colorfilters | 2 +-
wireshark.sln | 350
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
31 files changed, 1486 insertions(+), 1486 deletions(-)
I think we should do that and regarding the generated files we should
simply remove them from the repo.
If some of the developers does not set line ending properly on Windows
it cause no harm because
those problems can be easily spotted on Gerrit possibly by automated scripts.
I'm only a git wannabee, but I suspect the changes to the .svg files aren't intended. In addition, the wireshark.sln file definitely should have CRLF at all times.
The second answer to the SO question seems a bit more sensible to me, in that the output of git status is examined to determine if any binary (e.g. *.svg) or other files that should not be normalised (e.g. Wireshark.sln).
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Git and line endings
- From: Pascal Quantin
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git and line endings
- From: Graham Bloice
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git and line endings
- From: Pascal Quantin
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git and line endings
- From: Graham Bloice
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git and line endings
- From: Pascal Quantin
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git and line endings
- From: Bálint Réczey
- [Wireshark-dev] Git and line endings
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git and line endings
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git and line endings
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git and line endings
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: Help required to decode RRC message.
- Index(es):