OK, sorry, I really shouldn't start talking about things I haven't a
clue about. I was thinking the UAT was going to send you down a path
similar to decode-as which I guess it is.
Anyway, I think the answer is on the SSL wiki:
http://wiki.wireshark.org/SSL#start_tls
(Of course you'd also have to look into the LDAP dissector to figure out
how it deals with starting TLS.) It does appear there was some
discussion about it somewhat recently:
https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201306/msg00246.html
On 01/10/2014 04:05 PM, Rob Napier wrote:
So make a separate RSA key table within the amp protocol preferences?
And then pass that along to SSL when the protocol goes encrypted?
I assume the same issue impacts LDAP/TLS and XMPP?
-Rob
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Jeff Morriss
<jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I think for that you can't enter the encryption keys in the UAT but
rather your amp dissector would need to register for the SSL after
the negotiation.
On 01/09/14 11:55, Rob Napier wrote:
That was exactly it. Thank you!
I'm now seeing a much less critical issue:
The amp protocol starts off unencrypted, and then switches to
SSL after
some negotiation. When I first start wireshark (without providing a
decryption key), I see the two AMP negotiation packets, and then
SSLv3
packets. When I add the decryption key, the initial two handshake
packets get re-decoded as "SSL Continuation Data" and I lose the
unencrypted handshake information. The encrypted traffic then
dissects
correctly.
Is this expected? Is it possible to view both the encrypted and
unencrypted portions of the protocol on the same port?
-Rob
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Dirk Jagdmann <doj@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:doj@xxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:doj@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:doj@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
do you have a new_register_dissector("amp", ...) in the
proto_register_amp()
function? Otherwise the SSL dissector can not match the
"amp" string
to a
dissector handle/function.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe