Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9607] TFShark (Terminal FileShark)

[mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

Although I have to say I kinda liked Michal's suggestion of Omnivoroushark (or something similar with "omni") if fileshark doesn't work out.  My only complaint with Omnivoroushark is that we want to separate capture files (Wireshark) from non-capture (fileshark) files, so it's not really "omni".

-----Original Message-----
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
To: wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thu, Jan 2, 2014 9:55 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9607] TFShark (Terminal FileShark)

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 02:20:09PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9607
> 
> Michael Mann <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 URL|                            |http://www.wireshark.org/li
>                    |                            |sts/wireshark-dev/201306/ms
>                    |                            |g00101.html
> 
> --- Comment #1 from Michael Mann <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
> Mailing list comments on the subject of FileShark for reference:
> 
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201306/msg00101.html (start of
> thread, also shown in URL field above.  Using this as my main source of
> direction)
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201306/msg00102.html
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201306/msg00104.html
> 
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201307/msg00002.html (looks like
> we need a new name...)

No, I don't think so. They are the copycats, not us. Our product is still
called Wireshark and if we install a binary that is called fileshark then
there should not be a problem about it.

Ciao
     Jörg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe