Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Idea for process image dissection

[Roland Knall <rknall@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ok. But then the question comes up, if a UI interface should be part
of Wireshark or part of wsgd. As a last resort wsgd could be ported to
wireshark, but this is a shoe I would only put on me as a last step.

Also, should I implement the new UI only for the new (Qt) interface,
or for the GTK interface as well? I would prefer the first step, as I
do have good knowledge of the framework, but very little about GTK.

kind regards,
Roland

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Graham Bloice
<graham.bloice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 15 October 2013 17:25, Roland Knall <rknall@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> I actually did not know about wsgd.free.fr. For what I want to
>> achieve, this would be completely sufficient. But It would need a UI,
>> because the definition of the wsgd and fdesc files would be too much
>> for the nomal user.
>>
>> I will work on that instead, and see where I can go from there.
>>
>> Just one question though, why is this plugin not part of wireshark?
>>
>>
>
> I think the main reason is that it's C++.
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe